Advertising at The News And Times – advertising-newsandtimes.com

Advertisements – Advertising at The News And Times – advertising-newsandtimes.com | WE CONNECT!

The Global Security News

August 17, 2022 9:54 pm

The Global Security News- globalsecuritynews.org

Global Security News

Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (126 sites): “2016 Presidential Election Investigation” – Google News: After Senate trial, will Donald Trump face criminal charges? – INQUIRER.net

Post author By Admin
Post date February 6, 2021

Listen to this article

After Senate trial, will Donald Trump face criminal charges? INQUIRER.net

“2016 Presidential Election Investigation” – Google News

Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (126 sites)

The Lawfare Podcast

The Lawfare Podcast features discussions with experts, policymakers, and opinion leaders at the nexus of national security, law, and policy. On issues from foreign policy, homeland security, intelligence, and cybersecurity to governance and law, we have doubled down on seriousness at a time when others are running away from it. Visit us at www.lawfareblog.com.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.

Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the course of the Jan. 6 investigation, Congress has voted to hold four Trump associates in contempt and refer them to the Justice Department for prosecution over their failure to comply with subpoenas from the Jan. 6 committee. Steve Bannon was recently found guilty of contempt. One case, that of Peter Navarro, is still moving forward in criminal court. But the Justice Department declined to charge former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and aide Dan Scavino. Why? A recent filing by the Justice Department in civil litigation brought by Meadows may have some answers.

To discuss, Quinta Jurecic sat down with Jonathan David Shaub, a contributing editor to Lawfare and an assistant professor of law at the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law, and Mike Stern, former senior counsel to the House of Representatives. They talked about where the various cases stand and why, and what to make of the Justice Department’s filing spelling out its understanding of the doctrine of testimonial immunity for close presidential advisors.

You can read Jonathan’s take on the filing (with Rohini Kurup) here, and Mike’s here.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.

Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Search Episodes

Catching Up with the Jan. 6 Contempt of Congress Cases

August 17, 2022

The Lawfare Institute

The MTCR and Its Possible Reforms

August 16, 2022

The Lawfare Institute

Intelligence and the State with Jonathan House

August 15, 2022