Soft power is the capability to use economic or
cultural influence to shape the preferences of others. In the contest
for soft power dominance in Southeast Asia, China has been gaining ground on
the U.S. However, its recent ‘ actions
in the South China Sea are eroding these gains and playing into the hands of China’s
enemies like anti-China hawks and media in the U.S. and the region.
China has a history of intimidating states and international oil companies to cease operations in areas China claims. https://qz.com/1694322/south-china-seas-oil-and-natural-gas-pretty-important-after-all/ Given this background, Chinas continuing incursions with a seismic survey and Coast Guard vessels into oil blocks leased to India’s national oil company and a Russian company near Vanguard Bank in Vietnam’s claimed Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) are perceived to reflect China’s historic claim to much of the South China Sea. Indeed, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang said that the seismic survey vessel Haiyang Dizhi 8 is “operating in waters under the jurisdiction of China”. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/return-08222019170743.html
But that claim has been rejected by an international arbitration panel in a case brought against it under the UN Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS), by the Philippines – a perpetually poor and militarily defenseless developing country. That panel also ruled that no feature in the Spratlys is entitled to a 200 nautical mile EEZ. This means that China’s claim to parts of others’ legitimate EEZs in the South China Sea is not accepted by most nations – including those in Southeast Asia.
According to US State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus, “China’s actions undermine regional peace and security [and] impose economic costs on Southeast Asian states by blocking their access to _ _ unexploited hydrocarbon resources.” Now it is been undertaking marine scientific research (MSR) with a government -owned ship in what is clearly Vietnam’s legitimate EEZ while ignoring its so far futile protests. Ortagus said the actions of the survey vessel are “an escalation by Beijing in its efforts to intimidate other claimants out of developing resources in the South China Sea”. https://www.afp.com/en/news/15/us-raps-china-escalation-south-china-sea-doc-1jo9851
There may be ambiguity regarding where and what exactly China claims. But there is no ambiguity in its actions. They are a violation of UNCLOS which both have ratified. It requires prior permission for MSR by other states in a coastal country’s EEZ.
Moreover, by having Coast Guard and purported ‘maritime militia’ vessels accompany the government research ship gives the impression that China is employing the threat of use of force to back up its illegal incursion. Not only is this a blatant physical defiance of its international legal agreement, it is a gift to the China bashers and a sure loser in the soft power contest. Indeed, government officials and anti-China media in the U.S. and Vietnam – – as well as the domestic opposition to Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte –constitute a chorus of criticism. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/return-08222019170743.html; https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/us-raps-china-for–escalation–in-south-china-sea-11834424
Now Australia and Malaysia have joined the chorus although they have not called out China by name. https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/scott-morrison-takes-veiled-swipe-at-china-during-visit-to-vietnam/news-story/008732084e2ecb27c30c21150da28252 ; https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/malaysian-pm-criticizes-big-powers-for-disregarding-international-rules-3973788.html
A finer but nevertheless significant
point, China’s actions are also undermining its argument that some US military
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance probes in and over its EEZ
violate the UNCLOS requirements to obtain consent for such activities and to pay
due regard to the coastal state’s rights and duties in its EEZ. Now it is doing the same in other countries’
Another part of the picture is that China has been accused of delaying negotiations of a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea (COC). The patience of its negotiating partners is wearing thin and China critics are blaming it for the lack of progress. They are alleging that China is trying to use ASEAN and the COC in its struggle against the U.S. They point to China’s proposal to include in the COC a clause stating that “the Parties shall not hold joint military exercises with countries from outside the region, unless the parties concerned are notified beforehand and express no objection”.
Although the meaning of “parties concerned” is not clear, the proposal appears to be aimed at the U.S. and its extra regional allies and supporters like Japan and Australia. China has also proposed that “co-operation shall not be conducted _ with companies from countries outside the region”. This appears to be an attempt to confine petroleum exploitation in the South China Sea to cooperation between it and the other claimants.
In a clear rebuke to this proposal, Australia, Japan and the U.S. issued a joint statement that the COC should be “consistent with existing international law, as reflected in UNCLOS; _ _[and] not prejudice the interests of third parties or the rights of all states under international law_ _.” But that itself is not as important to ASEAN countries as the perception that China is pushing ASEAN members to change their foreign policy.
The collision between a Chinese
vessel and an anchored Philippine fishing boat and the failure of the Chinese
boat to help the victims has become an international embarassment. These serious charges question China’s
support for basic civilized norms. But instead of admitting fault and punishing
the guilty parties, China has demurred regarding this apparent inhumane breach
of ancient sea faring custom. It is as
if it did not have to address even this most egregious act.
This incident is being considered
in the context of its other aggressive behavior towards the Philippines –like
its seizure of Scarborough Shoal, its massing of fishing boats near contested
features claimed by the Philippines and its initial refusal – even if temporary
– to discuss the arbitration ruling with its close friend and supporter President
Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines—unnecessarily embarrassing and angering him.
In May 2017, Duterte claimed that China had threatened war if the Philippines
tried to enforce the ruling by drilling for oil in areas claimed by China. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3024099/philippine-president-rodrigo-duterte-head-beijing-under;
pattern does not paint a
pretty picture. Indeed, this behavior is beginning to look like
“imperialism”. Having suffered the bitter experience of political and
‘colonialism’, Southeast Asian nations are very sensitive to any real or
imagined slights stemming from a sense of cultural superiority. If this
behavior is continued it could
well destroy whatever gains in soft power China has painstakingly built
But it is not too late. China’s
in Southeast Asia is quite different from that of the Western colonialists and
neocolonialists in several significant respects. China also experienced domination by the West
and Japan and should be able to empathize with the bitterness of former
colonies and not repeat the colonialists’ mistakes. Moreover, it has more legitimacy gradually exerting power
and influence in a region of which it is a permanent part. Most important, in
the modern era it
has yet to subjugate any Southeast Asian nation—although it now seems to be
coming close to doing so in a de facto
Nevertheless, the damage so far is
reparable. Its economic power and
largesse somewhat mitigate its recent behavior. But China needs to be careful to keep it that
way if it seeks to maintain and even expand its soft power and political
influence in Southeast Asia. Slow but steady will win the soft power race. Use of
force or its threat to do so in its multitude of disputes in the South China
Sea with fellow ASEAN claimants could upset the apple cart of China-Southeast
Asia relations and ‘snatch defeat from the jaws of victory’.
piece first appeared in the IPP Review. https://ippreview.com/index.php/Blog/single/id/1066.html
1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (88 sites)